Browsing the archives for the Education category

Why not use hydrogen to fuel our cars?

Clean Energy, Education, Environment, Hydrogen Power

Q: Is hydrogen an environmentally friendly fuel? Why not use hydrogen to fuel our cars?

A: An internal combustion engine does not use an oxygen tank, instead it uses air from the atmosphere free of charge. That air is 80% Nitrogen (N2) and 20% Oxygen (O2). When you combine hydrogen with “air” you generate water (H2O) and Nitrogen Oxide (NOx).

Most people don’t realize that when you run Nitrogen (N2) through the combustion chamber you end up generating Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), which is the precursor to smog.

If you want to improve urban air quality, hyrdrogen based fuel is probably moving in the wrong direction.

Other issues concerning the use of hydrogen fuel cells:

  • Safety.  In case of a collision the car must be able to maintain the safety of the hydrogen. This means the hydrogen fueled car must be built heavier which makes the car less fuel efficient.
  • Environmental impact of producing hydrogen. Hydrogen can be produced by two methods:
  • Electrolysis of water. Electricity can be used to split water molecules to create pure hydrogen and oxygen. Where does that electricity come from? Burning coal, usually.
  • Reforming Fossil Fuels. Oil and natural gas contain hydrocarbons (molecules that contain hydrogen and carbon) Hydrogen can be split off of the carbon. But when you remove hydrogen from a hydrocarbon you generate a byproduct called carbon dioxide. Generating hydrogen from fossil fuel does not make it a renewable or clean energy.
  • The environmental impact of an energy source requires us to consider the cradle to cradle life cycle of that energy source. It does not make sense to burn coal to generate electricity to produce hydrogen to fuel our cars. It does not make sense to use a limited supply of a dirt energy source to generate hydrogen. To be successful, the hydrogen economy must have a large supply of electricity to be used in separate hydrogen from water. The electricity MUST be generated from a clean energy source.

  • Cost. Hydrogen is NOT cheap.

As consumers we MUST all become technically literate AND participate in the discussions required to help form sensible policy.

We must consider the cradle to cradle life cycle of energy sources we use. The health and well being of our planet and our civilization depends upon it.

No Comments

Build Renewable Energy NOW.

Clean Energy, Education, Environment, Renewable Energy, Video

Our desire to live comfortably on this planet does NOT give us the right to kill the oceans.

Offshore drilling is killing the oceans.

Our survival depends on healthy oceans.

We need to replace dirty energy with clean energy.

The amount of work required to replace dirty energy with clean energy is HUGE.

The effort to become a clean energy planet requires that we create 11.5 TW of new non-carbon based energy in the next 25 years.

To generate this much new energy, we will need to retool our global economy.

In chapter 9 of the video lecture below titled “Climate Change Recalculated,” Saul Griffith proposes a plan for what it would take to retool the world energy production.

No Comments

How Many Lightbulbs? - From Cambridge Ideas

Education, Wind Energy

In a passionate, personal analysis of the energy crisis in the UK, Cambridge University physicist, David Mackay, comes to some surprising conclusions about the way forward.

The film is based on his new book Sustainable Energy without the hot air, in which Prof Mackay has calculated the numbers involved for the alternatives to fossil fuels like coal, gas and oil.

He debunks some myths about energy saving - unplugging our phone chargers, does not make any appreciable difference. After showing us what won’t work - he goes on to show what will make a difference at home, like turning your thermostat down.

But, his big point is that this will not be enough - individual efforts are not enough. Instead we need to make sweeping national changes to our energy production, and we can’t reject everything available to us.

If we are going to follow the advice of climate scientists, and get off fossil fuels by 2050, which currently provide 90% of UK energy, Britain’s main options are wind power and nuclear power. But to make this huge change in UK power supply, Mackay says that UK has to get building now!

Bottomline: To get off fossil fuels by 2050, we need to get building NOW.

No Comments

Maya Lin’s ‘What is Missing’

Design, Education, Environment, Video

Maya Lin describes her project “What is Missing” at the California Academy of Sciences.

No Comments